SMR vs CMR: What You Need to Know
Last updated: December 2025
TL;DR: CMR for NAS/RAID, SMR is fine for cold storage and backups. The internet overreacts to SMR, but the concerns are real for specific workloads.
What's the Difference?
CMR (Conventional Magnetic Recording) writes tracks side by side without overlap. Each track is independent — you can rewrite any sector without affecting neighbors.
SMR (Shingled Magnetic Recording) overlaps tracks like roof shingles to squeeze more data per platter. The catch: rewriting a sector requires rewriting the entire "zone" of overlapping tracks.
| Feature | CMR | SMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sequential writes | Fast | Fast |
| Random writes | Fast | Slow (zone rewrite) |
| RAID rebuild | Normal | Very slow |
| NAS use | Recommended | Not recommended |
| Capacity per platter | Standard | ~20% higher |
| Price | Higher | Lower |
Why SMR Exists
Physics. Magnetic write heads are wider than read heads. SMR lets manufacturers use the same platters to store more data by accepting the write penalty tradeoff.
For manufacturers, SMR means:
- Higher capacity without more platters
- Lower production costs
- Competitive pricing on high-capacity consumer drives
The SMR Problem
SMR drives have a "media cache" — a CMR area for incoming writes. Data gets reorganized to SMR zones during idle time. This works fine until:
- The cache fills up — sustained writes stall while zones are reorganized
- RAID rebuild — massive sustained writes = worst-case scenario
- Random writes — each small write triggers zone reorganization
The WD Red Controversy (2020)
Western Digital shipped SMR drives labeled as "WD Red" NAS drives without disclosure. Users discovered degraded RAID rebuild times and performance issues. WD eventually created "WD Red Plus" (CMR) and "WD Red" (SMR) product lines.
Lesson: Always verify recording technology before buying NAS drives.
When SMR Is Actually Fine
Good use cases for SMR:
- Cold storage / Archives — Write once, read many. SMR excels here.
- Backup drives — Sequential writes during backup windows.
- Media storage — Large files, infrequent changes.
- Desktop storage — Documents, photos, music libraries.
- External drives — Most portable drives are SMR — that's fine for their use case.
Avoid SMR for:
- NAS with RAID — Rebuild times can be 5-10x longer
- ZFS / Unraid — Resilvering is painful
- Database workloads — Random writes kill performance
- VM storage — Random I/O patterns
- Download drives — Torrent seeding = constant random writes
How to Identify SMR Drives
Manufacturers don't always clearly label recording technology. Here's how to check:
- Check the product page — Look for "CMR" or "SMR" in specs
- Search "[model] SMR or CMR" — Community has documented most drives
- Check the datasheet — "Device-Managed SMR" or "Host-Managed SMR" indicates SMR
- Capacity vs platters — Unusually high capacity per platter often means SMR
Known SMR Drives (Avoid for NAS)
- WD Red (non-Plus) 2-6TB
- Seagate Barracuda 2-8TB (some models)
- Seagate Expansion Desktop (some models)
- Toshiba P300 (some capacities)
- Most portable/external 2.5" drives over 2TB
Known CMR Drives (Safe for NAS)
- WD Red Plus (all capacities)
- WD Red Pro (all capacities)
- Seagate IronWolf (all capacities)
- Seagate IronWolf Pro (all capacities)
- Seagate Exos (all capacities)
- WD Ultrastar (all capacities)
- Toshiba N300 (NAS series)
Performance Reality Check
SMR isn't as bad as forums make it sound for appropriate workloads:
| Workload | SMR vs CMR |
|---|---|
| Large file copy (sequential) | Nearly identical |
| Reading files | Identical |
| Backup (scheduled) | Fine — cache handles burst |
| RAID rebuild 8TB | CMR: ~12 hours, SMR: 2-4 days |
| Database writes | CMR: 10-50x faster |
Bottom Line
Building a NAS or RAID array? CMR only. The rebuild time risk isn't worth the savings.
Backup/archive drive? SMR is fine and often cheaper.
Desktop storage? Either works — CMR if you're paranoid, SMR if you want to save money.
Not sure? Buy CMR. The peace of mind is worth the premium.
Our Recommendations
All drives on DiskDojo are labeled with their recording technology. Filter by type to find CMR-only options:
- Seagate IronWolf Pro 20TB — CMR, NAS-rated
- WD Red Pro 20TB — CMR, NAS-rated
- Seagate Exos X20 20TB — CMR, enterprise